Identity Server: Upgrade Client to Angular 5

I have been working a lot on my basics sample project to explore some new client-side frameworks (React and Vue if you are interested). Since I have been away from the Identity Server sample for a while I thought it would be good to see what updates the project might need. It turns out that Angular was the big thing that was out of date. This post is going to cover the changes to get the project updated to Angular 5.

Package.json

In the Client App project open the  package.json file and update the version of the  @angular packages to at least the following version, and of course feel free to pin the exact version. I don’t just because of the nature of this sample.

At this point, I tried to run and got an error about the version of  rxjs being used. Instead of just blindly going package by package and seeing which versions were required I installed the Angular CLI and created a new Angular 5 application and used it as an example of what version I needed. Use the following commands if you would like to follow the same process since the current versions have changed by the time you are reading this post.

The above led me to the following version changes.

Attempt 2

At this point, I tried running the application again and received the following error.

Error: Version of @angular/compiler-cli needs to be 2.3.1 or greater. Current version is “5.0.1”.

As you can imagine I was surprised that 5.0.1 < 2.3.1. Turns out this is related to the version of @ngtools/webpack. This package deals with ahead-of-time compiling which my sample application uses, but the application I generated using the Angular CLI doesn’t. Updating to the following version cleared up the issue.

Open ID Connect Client

There was a much new version of the Open ID Connect Client that the Angular application is using so I upgrade it as well to the following version.

This version dropped the  startup_route so the following line had to be removed from the  AuthService class.

Final Steps

Now that the package versions are sorted run the following commands from a command prompt to make sure that all the new version are installed and in the proper places.

Wrapping Up

I am glad to have this upgrade done. It seems that every time I do one of these upgrades I end up down some rabbit hole. On the plus side, I seem to be getting faster at resolving the rabbit hole issues, or the frameworks have made a lot of progress on making sure the upgrade processes are simpler than they used to be. Either way, I get to expand my knowledge. I just need to schedule a bit more time before attempting upgrades.

The code in its finished state can be found here.

Identity Server: Migration to ASP.NET Core 2

The Identity App that is part of my IdentityServer sample project is the last application I have on GitHub (of the ones that will get upgraded) that needs an upgrade to ASP.NET Core. The starting point of the project before any changes can be found here. This post assumes that you have already followed my generic ASP.NET Core 2 migration post, which can be found here, on the project you are migrating. One final note of caution this post has been written using the RC1 version of the Identity Server NuGet packages and then moved to the final version so there will be two different related pull requests that will have to be looked at to get the full picture of all the changes.

Package Changes

The first change is to get a version of the Identity Server packages what will work from ASP.NET Core 2.

Database Initialization

I wasted a lot of time on finding out this was an issue when I was trying to create Entity Framework migrations and kept getting Unable to create an object of type ‘ApplicationDbContext’. Add an implementation of ‘IDesignTimeDbContextFactory‘ errors. The gist is database initialization needs to be moved out of  Startup and context constructors.

Let’s start with the  ApplicationDbContext and remove the following code from the constructor as well as the associated property.

Next, in the  Configure function of the  Startup class remove the following line.

We still need the database initialization code to run, but where should that be done? In the  Main function of the  Program class seems to be the new recommended location. The following is the new  Main function.

InitializeDatabase now needs to take an  IServiceProvider instead of an  IApplicationBuilder. This forced a lot of lines to change so the following is the full class.

Startup Changes

Most of the changes to the  Startup class are in the  ConfigureServices function, but some cross with the  Configure function as well. The existing AddIdentityServer extension has multiple changes especially if you are using Entity Framework for your configuration data.  AddTemporarySigningCredential is now  AddDeveloperSigningCredential. The following is the new version including configuration data.

The way to handle registration of external authentication has changed as well. For example, this application uses Twitter. The  UseTwitterAuthentication call in the  Configure function needs to be removed. The following added to the bottom of the  ConfigureServices is now the proper way to add external authentication providers.

Entity Framework

The new changes in Identity from the ASP.NET Core team included a new foreign key which is one of the things that Sqlite migrations can’t actually do. Since I don’t really have any data I care about I just deleted the database and the existing migrations and snapshots and regenerated everything. If you are using Sqlite and this isn’t an option for you check out this post for some options. If you aren’t using Sqlite then the migrations should work fine. The following are the commands to generate migrations for the 3 contexts that the Identity Application uses.

Quick Start UI Changes

As part of going from the RC1 version to the Final version, the Identity Server team updated the UI and related bits to be in line with the new features added in the ASP.NET Core 2.0 release. Turns out that resulted in a lot of changes. Since I haven’t done any custom work in this area of my Identity Application I deleted the related files in my local project and pulled from the ASP.NET and Entity Framework Combined sample. I am going to give a good idea of all the files I replace, but in case I miss something GitHub will have the full story.

In the Controllers folder replace  AccountController.cs and  ManageController.cs. Add or replace the following folders:   ExtensionsModelsQuickstartServices, and  Views.

Application Insights Error

I ran into the following error.

System.InvalidOperationException: No service for type ‘Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.AspNetCore.JavaScriptSnippet’ has been registered.

You may or may not see it, but if you do open the  _Layout.cshtml and remove the following two lines.

Wrapping up

If you hit any issues not covered above make sure and check out the breaking changes issue. The completed code can be found here for part 1 and here for part 2.

Identity Server: Deploy to Azure

This post is going to cover taking the existing set of applications we have been using to learn about Identity Server and deploying them to Azure. The starting point of the code can be found here.

Prep Work

The applications as they stand from the link above are not ready to be pushed to Azure most due to some configuration changes that are needed. We will go through each of the applications and take the hard-coded values and move them to  appsettings.json.

API Application Configuration

The API application needs two configuration values for the address of the Identity Application and the address of the Client Application. The following two lines need to be added to the application’s  appsettings.json file.

Then in the  Startup class, the values need to be used. The Identity Server address is used in the JWT Bearer setup.

Then the Client address is used in the CORS setup.

Identity Application Configuration

The Identity application needs a configuration value for the address of the address of the Client Application. The following line needs to be added to the application’s  appsettings.json file.

Next, the  Config class needs a reference to configuration passed into the  GetClients function.

Next, the references to  http://localhost:5002 need to be replaced with the value from the configuration. The following is one example.

Identity Application Entity Framework

As part of publishing this set of applications, this example is going to use Azure SQL and right now the application is set up to use SQLite. In the  Startup class replace  UseSqlite with  UseSqlServer. The following is an example of one of the needed replacements.

When switching database providers make sure to delete and recreate your database migrations. I didn’t to begin with and it cost me a lot of time in changing down a strange error which this post covers.

Client Application Configuration

The Client application needs two configuration values for the address of the Identity Application and the address of the API Application. The following two lines need to be added to the application’s  appsettings.json file.

Then in the  Startup class, the Identity Server Address needs to be used in the  AddOpenIdConnect call.

Next, the configuration values need to be passed to the Angular application. This process ended up being harder to figure out that I had anticipated and turned into a full blog post on its own. See this post for the details. The code for all the changes will also be on GitHub in case you need to the the diff for the client application.

Publish to Azure

Right-click on the Identity Application and select Publish.

This will show the Publish screen which provides the option to publish to Azure. We don’t have an existing App Service so we are going to create a new one. This page in the official docs explains all the options available on the publish screen. Click the publish button to continue.

The next screen that shows is the Create App Service Screen. I used all the default values and created a new Resource Group and App Service Plan. Keep in mind that the resource group and plan will be reused for the remaining two applications we are looking deploy. The only thing that will change between the applications on this screen will be the App Name.

The services tab looks like the following.

Next in the additional resources box lets hit the plus button next to SQL Database since our group of applications is going to need somewhere to store data. This will take us to the Configure SQL Database screen.

Since I don’t already have a SQL Server setup I am going to hit the New button to add one. That results in the next screen where you enter a name for the server as well as a username and password. After entering the required information click OK.

This will put you back on the configure database screen with most of it filled out. Make sure to set the database name you want to use.

Finally back on the Create App Service screen, you will see all the resources that you selected and configured. When you are satisfied with what you see click the Create button and let Azure do its magic.

When it is done you will see the profile now listed on the Publish page.

The above needs to be repeated for both the API and Client Applications, but using the Resource Group and App Service plan created above. Each profile should use a unique application name.

Identity Application Azure Configuration

The Identity Application needs access to the database that we created above. This means we need to set the  DefaultConnection. The first step is to determine what the connection string should be. On the Azure Portal in your list of resources select the SQL database that we created above.

On the next page copy the provided connection string. Now navigate to the Identity App Service and under the Settings section select Application settings. Scroll down and find the Connection strings section and enter the copied value as the DefaultConnection.

Just above the Connection strings section we also need to enter a few values in the App settings section. For the Identity Application, we need the Twitter key and secret as well as the address of the client application. The following is a screenshot minus the actual values.

For the ClientAddress use the URL found in the Overview of the Client App’s App Service page.

API Application Azure Configuration

From the list of resources select the API App’s App Service page and in the Settings section select Application settings. In the App settings section add values for  IdentityServerAddress and  ClientAddress. As with the  ClientAddress above the URLs for each application can be found on their respective App Service pages.

Client Application Azure Configuration

From the list of resources select the Client App’s App Service page and in the Settings section select Application settings. In the App settings section add values for  IdentityServerAddress and  ApiAddress.

Wrapping Up

At this point, you should be able to load up the application at the client address provided by Azure and have a working application. Overall the deployment to Azure was pretty easy. Getting the applications prepared to be deployed was a bit more challenging and sent me down a couple of rabbit holes. The code in its final state can be found here.

Identity Server: API Migration to ASP.NET Core 2

After writing the basic migration guide from ASP.NET Core 1.1.x to 2.0 I embarked on the task of upgrading the rest of the projects I have on GitHub. For the most part, it has been a pretty smooth transition. This post is going cover the differences that I hit while converting an API that is part of my IdentityServer sample project. This assumes that you have already followed my other migration post which can be found here.

Package Changes

The source of this conversion being different is that the  IdentityServer4.AccessTokenValidation NuGet package is not currently supported on ASP.NET Core 2. Token validation can be done using bits provided by the framework. This is the recommended path suggested by the IdentityServer team as posted on this issue. Longer term you may want to switch back if you have a need for more features not provided by the Microsoft implementation as pointed out in this issue.

As for the actual change, just remove the reference to  IdentityServer4.AccessTokenValidation from your project using the NuGet UI, Package Manager Console, or by editing the  csproj file.

Startup

All the rest of the changes are in the  Startup class. First, in the  Configure function  app.UseIdentityServerAuthentication gets replaced with  app.UseAuthentication.

In the  ConfigureServices function is now where JWT Bearer options are set up. First, we have to add the type of authentication the API is going to use and then the options for JWT Bearer are set, which will match the settings that were being used before with the IdentityServer package.

Wrapping up

With the above, your API can run on ASP.NET Core 2 and still verify authorization using IdentityServer4. My IdentityServer sample project is taking the longest to update so I would expect at least one or two more posts on the process as each of the projects gets upgraded.

All Migrations are not Created Equal

While trying to deploy my sample Identity Server set of applications to Azure I got the following error when the Entity Framework migrations attempted to run.

This was not something I would get when attempting to run locally, but it failed every time when using SQL Azure. Long store short is that the migrations that were trying to be applied were created when I was using Sqlite as a backing store ( UseSqlite).

I deleted all the migrations and recreated them with the app being aware that it would be running on SQL Server ( UseSqlServer) and all worked as it should. It makes total sense that the migrations would vary based on the data provider being used, but not something I had really thought about. Not something I will forget again.

Identity Server: External Authentication using Twitter

This post is going to cover adding authentication using Twitter to the same project that has been used in all of my IdentityServer examples. The same basic idea would apply to almost any third party authentication setup so this should give you a good starting point for any integration. The starting point of the code can be found here.

Create Twitter App

Before any code changes create a new application on Twitter via this page. Click Create New App to begin the process.

On the Create an application page enter all the requested information. Note that the website won’t allow a localhost address. If you don’t have a real address for your application just enter a random URL as I did here. When finished click Create your Twitter application.

Now that we have an application click on the Keys and Access Tokens tab. We will need both the Consumer Key and Consumer Secret when we get to the Identity Application.

Identity Application Changes

Now that we have a Twitter application ready to go let us dive into the changes needed to the Identity Application. The first step is to add a reference to Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.Twitter via NuGet.

Next in the  ConfigureServices function of the  Startup class after  app.UseIdentityServer() add the following.

The first three options should a straight forward enough. The next two are the values from the Twitter application I mentioned above. In this example, I am storing the values using User Secrets which get pulled out of configuration. For more details on how to set up secrets, you can see this post.

The above are all the changes required. The Identity Application will now allow users to auth using Twitter.

Logging in using Twitter

As you can see below the login page now has a button for Twitter.

When the user chooses to log in using Twitter they are shown the following page where they must approve access to their Twitter account from your application.

If this is the first time a user has logged in with Twitter they will be prompted to enter an email address to finish registration.

Wrapping up

As you can see adding external authentication is super simple. Check out the Microsoft Docs on Twitter Auth (ASP.NET Core 2.0 so look out for differences if you are not on the preview bits) and IdentityServer Docs on External Auth for more information.

The finished code can be found here.

 

Identity Server: Changing Angular OpenID Connect Clients

Thanks to Andrew Stegmaier opening this issue on the repo that goes with my IdentityServer exploration I was made aware of a certified OpendID Connect client specifically written for Angular (4+). The angular-auth-oidc-client was created by damienbod. This post is going to cover the transition to this new client. The starting point of the code can be found here. All the changes discussed in this post take place in the ClientApp project.

Package Changes

In  package.json the following changes need to be made using your package manager of choice or manually changing the fill and doing a restore.

App Module Changes

Both  app.module.client.ts and  app.module.server.ts got a little cleanup to remove the duplicate provider code. The following lines were deleted from both files.

The  providers array moved to using providers imported from  app.module.shared.ts.

Next, in  app.module.shared.ts the following imports were removed.

Then, the following import for the OpenId Connect client was added.

In the  declarations array  CallbackComponent was removed. In the  imports array  AuthModule.forRoot() was added. The route for  CallbackComponent was removed and the  canActivate condition was removed from the  fetch-data route. Finally, the  providers section is reduced to only the  AuthService. That was a lot of changes, so I am including the full finished class below.

File Deletions

The following files were completely removed. Some of them may come back in a different form, but for the moment the functions they were handling are being dealt with in a different way.

Auth Service

The  AuthService class was pretty much rewritten since it is at the core of the interaction with the OpenId Connect client. It still contains pretty much all the functionality as before just using the new client. The following is most of the class. I removed all of the HTTP calls except for  get to save space.

It doesn’t show the best in the world here so be sure and check it out on GitHub. All the IdentityServer configuration is done in the  constructor using the  OpenIDImplicitFlowConfiguration class.

Navigation Component

The  NavMenuComponent class now needs some changes to match the new  AuthService. First, the following change to the imports.

The  AuthService class now provides the ability to subscribe to changes in the user’s authorization. To handle the subscription and unsubscription the class will implement both OnInit and  OnDestroy. Here is the new class declaration.

Next, here is the implementation of ngOnInit which handles the subscription to the change in  isAuthorized.

Then,  ngOnDestroy handles the unsubscription.

The class level variable for  _loggedIn is replaced with the following two variables.

The  constructor has been greatly simplified and now only takes an instance of the  AuthService.

Finally, the  login and  logout functions have changed to match the new function names in the  AuthService class.

Navigation Component UI

In the  navmenu.component.html file, a couple of tweaks are required based on the new variable names used above. The first set is related to showing either Login or Logout.

The final change in this file was to make the link to  fetch-data only show if the user is logging instead of sending the user to an unauthorized view.

Fetch Data Component

The final changes for the conversion to the new client are in the  fetchdata.component.ts and they are only needed because of a rename of the HTTP Get helper in the  AuthService.

Wrapping Up

This change took a lot of changes, but in the long run, it is going to be a better choice since the new client is focused on Angular. Another great thing about this client is they are looking into ways to handle the first load not remembering the user is logged in due to server side rendering (issue #36).

The finished code for this post can be found here.

Identity Server: Redirect When Route Requires Logged in User

This post is going to continue where the series on IdentityServer4 left off, but I am not officially making it part of the series. There may be a few posts like this where I improve on the example applications from the series. The starting code for this post can be found here.

All the changes in the post are in the Client Application from the sample linked above. I did some cleanup on a couple of files so if you are looking for the differences keep in mind most of the changes are a result of the cleanup.

Unauthorized Component

The first step is to add a new component that will be shown to the user when they navigate to a page that requires them to be logged in but they are not. Add a  unauthorized.component.html file to the  ClientApp/app/components/unauthorized/ directory with the following contents.

This will tell the user they need to log in and provide a login button and a button to go back to the previous page. Next, add a  unauthorized.component.ts file to the same directory. This class will handle the clicks from the view.

This class is using the  AuthService for login and Angular’s  Location class to move back to the previous page.

New Component Usage

Now that this new component exists it needs to set up in  app.module.shared.ts. First, add an import.

Next, add to the  declarations array.

Finally, add unauthorized to the routes array.

Now that this new component is in place how does it get used? Well, any route that has  canActivate:[AuthGuardService] will require the user to be logged in to activate. For example, the  fetch-data route above won’t activate unless the user is logged in.

Auth Guard Service

AuthGuardService is an existing class in the project. The following is the full file.

As you can see in the  canActivate function if the user is logged in then the function returns true otherwise, the user is routed to the unauthorized component. Before the changes in this post, this dropped the user back on the home page since the unauthorized component didn’t exist.

Wrapping up

With the changes above the user gets a slightly better experience. Just being dropped on the home page wasn’t very helpful as to why that was happening. This at least lets the user know they need to log in. Another option could be to hide the navigation for the routes they don’t have access to until they log it.

The finished version of the code can be found here.

Identity Server: Calling Secured API from Angular

This post is a continuation of a series of posts that follow my initial looking into using IdentityServer4 in ASP.NET Core with an API and an Angular front end. The following are the related posts.

Identity Server: Introduction
Identity Server: Sample Exploration and Initial Project Setup
Identity Server: Interactive Login using MVC
Identity Server: From Implicit to Hybrid Flow
Identity Server: Using ASP.NET Core Identity
Identity Server: Using Entity Framework Core for Configuration Data
Identity Server: Usage from Angular

This post is going to take the solution from last week, the code can be found here, and add an example of the Client Application (Angular) calling an endpoint on the API Application that requires a user with permissions.

API Application

To provide an endpoint to call with minimal changes this example just moves the SampleDataController from the Client Application to the API Application. The following is the full class.

Make special note that this class now has the  Authorize attribute applied which is the only change that was made when moving the file from the Client Application. This attribute is what will require an authorized user for all the routes this controller services.

Client Application

In the Client Application, the first step is to remove the  SampleDataController since it is now in the API Application.

Next, in the  app.module.client.ts file, add a new provider which can be used to supply the URL of the API to the rest of the Client Application. Don’t take this as best practices for injecting configuration data it is just an easy way to handle it in this application. The following is the full class without the imports (which haven’t changed) the new item is the  API_URL.

Now for the changes that need to be made to the  FetchDataComponent which is the class that will call the new API endpoint. First, add an import for the  AuthService.

Next, there are a couple of changes to the signature of the constructor. The first is to use  'API_URL' instead of  'ORIGIN_URL'. The second is to provide for injection of the  AuthService. The following is a comparison between the version of the constructor signature.

The final change is to use  authService.AuthGet with the new URL instead of  http.get.

With the above changes, the user has to be logged in or the API will respond with not authorized for the weather forecasts end point. The Client Application doesn’t have anything to provide the user with the fact they aren’t authorized at the moment, but that is outside the scope of this entry.

So far we haven’t look at the code in the  AuthService class, but I do want to explain what the  AuthGet function is doing and the related functions for put, delete, and post. These calls are wrappers around the standard Angular HTTP library calls that add authorization headers based on the logged in user. The following is the code of the  AuthGet as well as two helper functions the class uses to add the headers.

Wrapping up

It feels like this application is finally getting to the point where other development could happen if it were more than a demo, which is exciting. My thought on how this could be used for real applications is the Identity Application would stand on its own and be used by many clients. The Client Application with a few more tweaks could be used as a template for Angular applications. The completed code can be found here.

This post finishes up the core of what I set out to learn about IdentityServer, but there could be more related posts as I continue to add some polish to the current implementation of the sample solution.

Identity Server: Usage from Angular

This post is a continuation of a series of posts that follow my initial looking into using IdentityServer4 in ASP.NET Core with an API and an Angular front end. The following are the related posts.

Identity Server: Introduction
Identity Server: Sample Exploration and Initial Project Setup
Identity Server: Interactive Login using MVC
Identity Server: From Implicit to Hybrid Flow
Identity Server: Using ASP.NET Core Identity
Identity Server: Using Entity Framework Core for Configuration Data
Identity Server: Usage from Angular (this post)

This post is finally going to add login from Angular in the Client Application. It has been a long time coming and will be a starting point, based on a few examples I found which I will list at the end. The starting point of the code can be found here.

API Application

In order for the Client Application to be able to call the API Application, there are some changes needed to allow cross-origin resource sharing. For more details check out this post only the basics will be covered here. First, add the following NuGet package.

  • Microsoft.AspNetCore.Cors

Next, in the  ConfigureServices function of the  Startup class add AddCors before AddMvc. The following is the full function. This allows calls to the API Application from the Client Application which is running on localhost on port 5002.

Then, in the  Configure function add  app.UseCors("default"); to make sure the default policy defined above is enforced. The following is the full function.

Identity Application

The Identity Application doesn’t have a lot of changes, but some of the configuration between it and the Client Application is what took me the bulk of time getting the code for this post setup and going.

If you are keeping up with the series then last you will know last week all the configuration data was moved to a database using Entity Framework Core. This is a bit of a problem now that I need to add a new client and the configuration data doesn’t any associated UI. To work around this I just added the new client to the  Config class in the  GetClients function and then deleted the existing database and let Entity Framework recreate it based on the new seed data. Not optimal, but I didn’t want to complicate things by adding a UI for the client setup. The following is the new client.

There are a few things in this configuration that took me some time to get right. First of all best, I have been able to tell with this style of application implicit flow is the way to go which is handled by using a  GrantTypes.Implicit for the  AllowedGrantTypes.

The next issues I ran was a cross-origin resource sharing issue. Thankfully IdentityServer makes it easy to specify what origins should be allowed using the  AllowedCorsOrigins property. In this example, we want to allow requests from the URL of our Client Application which is http://localhost:5002.

The last issue I had on was with the URIs I had set. The configuration in IdentityServer needs to exactly match the setup in the Client Application or you will have issues. I also had trouble trying to use the raw base address (http://localhost:5002) as the  PostLogoutRedirectUris so look out for that as well.

Client Application

In the client application open the  package.json file and add the following the  dependencies section.

I also updated the typescript version to 2.3.4. Be cautious when changing the version of typescript as there is an issue with Angular and typescript 2.4.x at the moment.

At this point in the process, I had to find some resources on how to continue. The following are the ones I leaned on most.

ANGULAR OPENID CONNECT IMPLICIT FLOW WITH IDENTITYSERVER4
ASP.NET Core & Angular2 + OpenID Connect using Visual Studio Code
Repo for the previous link
Repo for with example Angular OidcClient

Getting this part of the application working involved a lot of changes and instead of going in depth on everything I am going to recommend just copying in the following files for the finished example code and dig more into them after you get an example working. Here is the list of files.

  • ClientApp/ClientApp/app/components/callback/callback.component.ts
  • ClientApp/ClientApp/app/components/services/ – whole directory
  • ClientApp/ClientApp/boot-server.ts – related to a typescript error only if needed

With the above files in place, we will now focus on using the functionality they provide to log in and protect routes. To begin   app.module.client.tsapp.module.server.ts and  app.module.shared.ts all need the next set of changes. I haven’t tried it yet, but I bet this change could just be made in the shared file and used in the other two. Add the following imports.

Next, add the same three items to the array of providers (or add one if it doesn’t exist). The following is an example from the shared file.

Finally, in the shared file change any routes that you would like to require the user to be logged in to be like the following which utilizes the  canActivate of the route.

In the  navmenu.component.html which is the UI for the navigation menu add the following two options to the unordered list.

The user will only ever see one of the above options based on being logged in or not which is what the  *ngIf is doing.

The navigation view model ( navmenu.component.ts) changed a bit more. The following is the complete file.

New imports were added for the  AuthService and  GlobalEventsManager which get injected into the constructor of the class. The class also contains a _loggedIn property to track if the user is logged in or not. Finally, functions were added for  login and  logout to go with the two new links shown in the navigation.

Wrapping up

With the above, the Client Application can now log a user in and out utilizing IdentityServer from Angular. There are a lot of details in the files we just copied, but with a working sample, it is much easier to examine/customize how the process is being handled. Check back next week to see how to call the API Application from the Angular part of the Client Application.

The completed code can be found here.