Identity Server: Deploy to Azure

This post is going to cover taking the existing set of applications we have been using to learn about Identity Server and deploying them to Azure. The starting point of the code can be found here.

Prep Work

The applications as they stand from the link above are not ready to be pushed to Azure most due to some configuration changes that are needed. We will go through each of the applications and take the hard-coded values and move them to  appsettings.json.

API Application Configuration

The API application needs two configuration values for the address of the Identity Application and the address of the Client Application. The following two lines need to be added to the application’s  appsettings.json file.

Then in the  Startup class, the values need to be used. The Identity Server address is used in the JWT Bearer setup.

Then the Client address is used in the CORS setup.

Identity Application Configuration

The Identity application needs a configuration value for the address of the address of the Client Application. The following line needs to be added to the application’s  appsettings.json file.

Next, the  Config class needs a reference to configuration passed into the  GetClients function.

Next, the references to  http://localhost:5002 need to be replaced with the value from the configuration. The following is one example.

Identity Application Entity Framework

As part of publishing this set of applications, this example is going to use Azure SQL and right now the application is set up to use SQLite. In the  Startup class replace  UseSqlite with  UseSqlServer. The following is an example of one of the needed replacements.

When switching database providers make sure to delete and recreate your database migrations. I didn’t to begin with and it cost me a lot of time in changing down a strange error which this post covers.

Client Application Configuration

The Client application needs two configuration values for the address of the Identity Application and the address of the API Application. The following two lines need to be added to the application’s  appsettings.json file.

Then in the  Startup class, the Identity Server Address needs to be used in the  AddOpenIdConnect call.

Next, the configuration values need to be passed to the Angular application. This process ended up being harder to figure out that I had anticipated and turned into a full blog post on its own. See this post for the details. The code for all the changes will also be on GitHub in case you need to the the diff for the client application.

Publish to Azure

Right-click on the Identity Application and select Publish.

This will show the Publish screen which provides the option to publish to Azure. We don’t have an existing App Service so we are going to create a new one. This page in the official docs explains all the options available on the publish screen. Click the publish button to continue.

The next screen that shows is the Create App Service Screen. I used all the default values and created a new Resource Group and App Service Plan. Keep in mind that the resource group and plan will be reused for the remaining two applications we are looking deploy. The only thing that will change between the applications on this screen will be the App Name.

The services tab looks like the following.

Next in the additional resources box lets hit the plus button next to SQL Database since our group of applications is going to need somewhere to store data. This will take us to the Configure SQL Database screen.

Since I don’t already have a SQL Server setup I am going to hit the New button to add one. That results in the next screen where you enter a name for the server as well as a username and password. After entering the required information click OK.

This will put you back on the configure database screen with most of it filled out. Make sure to set the database name you want to use.

Finally back on the Create App Service screen, you will see all the resources that you selected and configured. When you are satisfied with what you see click the Create button and let Azure do its magic.

When it is done you will see the profile now listed on the Publish page.

The above needs to be repeated for both the API and Client Applications, but using the Resource Group and App Service plan created above. Each profile should use a unique application name.

Identity Application Azure Configuration

The Identity Application needs access to the database that we created above. This means we need to set the  DefaultConnection. The first step is to determine what the connection string should be. On the Azure Portal in your list of resources select the SQL database that we created above.

On the next page copy the provided connection string. Now navigate to the Identity App Service and under the Settings section select Application settings. Scroll down and find the Connection strings section and enter the copied value as the DefaultConnection.

Just above the Connection strings section we also need to enter a few values in the App settings section. For the Identity Application, we need the Twitter key and secret as well as the address of the client application. The following is a screenshot minus the actual values.

For the ClientAddress use the URL found in the Overview of the Client App’s App Service page.

API Application Azure Configuration

From the list of resources select the API App’s App Service page and in the Settings section select Application settings. In the App settings section add values for  IdentityServerAddress and  ClientAddress. As with the  ClientAddress above the URLs for each application can be found on their respective App Service pages.

Client Application Azure Configuration

From the list of resources select the Client App’s App Service page and in the Settings section select Application settings. In the App settings section add values for  IdentityServerAddress and  ApiAddress.

Wrapping Up

At this point, you should be able to load up the application at the client address provided by Azure and have a working application. Overall the deployment to Azure was pretty easy. Getting the applications prepared to be deployed was a bit more challenging and sent me down a couple of rabbit holes. The code in its final state can be found here.

Pass ASP.NET Core Appsettings Values to Angular

As part of getting my set of Identity Server 4 sample applications to run in Azure, I needed a way in the Client Application to pass some configuration values from  appsettings.json to the Angular front end that could be used both during server-side rendering and client-side rendering. This application is using JavaScriptServices. This solution may need tweaking if your application isn’t using JavaScriptServices. The code for the client application can be found here.

Settings

In this example, we need to pass the address of our Identity Server and API from  appsettings.json to Angular. The following is the settings file for this example.

Providing Configuration Data to Angular

In this application, Angular is loaded from the index action of the home controller. This view can be found in the  Views/Home folder in the  Index.cshtml file. The following is the file before any changes.

The first change needed is to inject the configuration data using ASP.NET Core’s DI system. Add the following two lines at the top of the file.

Now the configuration data from the application is available to this view. Next, we need to pull a couple of values out of the configuration data and pass it to the Angular application. To do this we are going to use the  asp-prerender-data tag helper. You can read more about it in the official docs. The idea is you construct an object which is then serialized and stored in  params.data. In our example, we are passing the URLs for the Identity and API Applications.

The above is creating a new object with an  apiUrl property and an  identityUrl property. The following is the full completed view for reference.

Angular Server-Side Boot

When Angular gets prerendered on the server-side it runs the code in the  boot.server.ts file. This is where we will set up the providers needed on for the server side prerender. This is the bit that I missed for the longest time when trying to get this example going. I kept trying to find a way to add the providers in the  app.module.server.ts file. Add any providers you need to the  providers constant. For example, the following is passing URLs for an API and Identity Server in addition to the defaults provided by JavaScriptServices.

Lower in the same file we can pass through the configuration values to the client side render as globals on the window object. To do this add a  globals property to the object being passed to the  resolve call.

The above will have the URLs as part of a single object, but you could have each URL as its own property if you prefer.

Angular Client-Side

Now that the server-side has providers for API URL and Identity URL we need to provide the client-side with the same capabilities. These changes will be in the  app.module.browser.ts file. The first step is to add providers for each.

Next, we need functions to return the URLs from the  url_Config property of the window object which the following two functions do.

Wrapping Up

With the above, you can now use your configuration values from ASP.NET Core and pass them through to your Angular application. In hindsight, the process is pretty simple, but getting to that point took me much longer to figure out than I would like to admit. I hope this post saves you some time!

Identity Server: API Migration to ASP.NET Core 2

After writing the basic migration guide from ASP.NET Core 1.1.x to 2.0 I embarked on the task of upgrading the rest of the projects I have on GitHub. For the most part, it has been a pretty smooth transition. This post is going cover the differences that I hit while converting an API that is part of my IdentityServer sample project. This assumes that you have already followed my other migration post which can be found here.

Package Changes

The source of this conversion being different is that the  IdentityServer4.AccessTokenValidation NuGet package is not currently supported on ASP.NET Core 2. Token validation can be done using bits provided by the framework. This is the recommended path suggested by the IdentityServer team as posted on this issue. Longer term you may want to switch back if you have a need for more features not provided by the Microsoft implementation as pointed out in this issue.

As for the actual change, just remove the reference to  IdentityServer4.AccessTokenValidation from your project using the NuGet UI, Package Manager Console, or by editing the  csproj file.

Startup

All the rest of the changes are in the  Startup class. First, in the  Configure function  app.UseIdentityServerAuthentication gets replaced with  app.UseAuthentication.

In the  ConfigureServices function is now where JWT Bearer options are set up. First, we have to add the type of authentication the API is going to use and then the options for JWT Bearer are set, which will match the settings that were being used before with the IdentityServer package.

Wrapping up

With the above, your API can run on ASP.NET Core 2 and still verify authorization using IdentityServer4. My IdentityServer sample project is taking the longest to update so I would expect at least one or two more posts on the process as each of the projects gets upgraded.

All Migrations are not Created Equal

While trying to deploy my sample Identity Server set of applications to Azure I got the following error when the Entity Framework migrations attempted to run.

This was not something I would get when attempting to run locally, but it failed every time when using SQL Azure. Long store short is that the migrations that were trying to be applied were created when I was using Sqlite as a backing store ( UseSqlite).

I deleted all the migrations and recreated them with the app being aware that it would be running on SQL Server ( UseSqlServer) and all worked as it should. It makes total sense that the migrations would vary based on the data provider being used, but not something I had really thought about. Not something I will forget again.

Create a .NET Standard Library with Visual Studio 2017

It has been almost a year since I wrote this post on creating a .NET Standard Library which was before Visual Studio 2017 was released. This post is going to cover the same basic idea, but for the new tooling which has vastly simplified the process.

.NET Standard Library

The .NET Standard Library specifies what .NET APIs are available based on the version of the .NET Standard Library being implemented. The following is a comparison to portable class libraries that really helped me understand the difference. This was pulled from the .NET Standard Library link above.

.NET Standard Library can be thought of as the next generation of Portable Class Libraries (PCL). The .NET Standard Library improves on the experience of creating portable libraries by curating a standard BCL and establishing greater uniformity across .NET runtimes as a result. A library that targets the .NET Standard Library is a PCL or a “.NET Standard-based PCL”. Existing PCLs are “profile-based PCLs”.

The .NET Standard Library and PCL profiles were created for similar purposes but also differ in key ways.

Similarities:

  • Defines APIs that can be used for binary code sharing.

Differences:

  • The .NET Standard Library is a curated set of APIs, while PCL profiles are defined by intersections of existing platforms.
  • The .NET Standard Library linearly versions, while PCL profiles do not.
  • PCL profiles represents Microsoft platforms while the .NET Standard Library is agnostic to platform.

Create a .NET Standard Library

In Visual Studio click File > New > Project.

This will launch the New Project dialog. Find the .NET Standard templates and select Class Library.

Now that the library has been created right click on the project and go to properties. On the Application tab, there is an option to for Target framework which currently defaults to .NETStandard 1.4. Depending on your platform your library needs to support will decide which version of the .NET Standard you need to use.

See the chart on this page for help with picking a version of the standard. The lower the version of the standard you target the more platforms your library will run on, but keep in mind the lower the version the smaller the API surface that is available.

Wrapping up

This process is so much easier than it was in Visual Studio 2015. The tooling around .NET Core and .NET Standard has gotten so much better. This type of library is the future and I highly recommend using .NET Standard when you have the option over portable class libraries.

Identity Server: External Authentication using Twitter

This post is going to cover adding authentication using Twitter to the same project that has been used in all of my IdentityServer examples. The same basic idea would apply to almost any third party authentication setup so this should give you a good starting point for any integration. The starting point of the code can be found here.

Create Twitter App

Before any code changes create a new application on Twitter via this page. Click Create New App to begin the process.

On the Create an application page enter all the requested information. Note that the website won’t allow a localhost address. If you don’t have a real address for your application just enter a random URL as I did here. When finished click Create your Twitter application.

Now that we have an application click on the Keys and Access Tokens tab. We will need both the Consumer Key and Consumer Secret when we get to the Identity Application.

Identity Application Changes

Now that we have a Twitter application ready to go let us dive into the changes needed to the Identity Application. The first step is to add a reference to Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.Twitter via NuGet.

Next in the  ConfigureServices function of the  Startup class after  app.UseIdentityServer() add the following.

The first three options should a straight forward enough. The next two are the values from the Twitter application I mentioned above. In this example, I am storing the values using User Secrets which get pulled out of configuration. For more details on how to set up secrets, you can see this post.

The above are all the changes required. The Identity Application will now allow users to auth using Twitter.

Logging in using Twitter

As you can see below the login page now has a button for Twitter.

When the user chooses to log in using Twitter they are shown the following page where they must approve access to their Twitter account from your application.

If this is the first time a user has logged in with Twitter they will be prompted to enter an email address to finish registration.

Wrapping up

As you can see adding external authentication is super simple. Check out the Microsoft Docs on Twitter Auth (ASP.NET Core 2.0 so look out for differences if you are not on the preview bits) and IdentityServer Docs on External Auth for more information.

The finished code can be found here.

 

Identity Server: Changing Angular OpenID Connect Clients

Thanks to Andrew Stegmaier opening this issue on the repo that goes with my IdentityServer exploration I was made aware of a certified OpendID Connect client specifically written for Angular (4+). The angular-auth-oidc-client was created by damienbod. This post is going to cover the transition to this new client. The starting point of the code can be found here. All the changes discussed in this post take place in the ClientApp project.

Package Changes

In  package.json the following changes need to be made using your package manager of choice or manually changing the fill and doing a restore.

App Module Changes

Both  app.module.client.ts and  app.module.server.ts got a little cleanup to remove the duplicate provider code. The following lines were deleted from both files.

The  providers array moved to using providers imported from  app.module.shared.ts.

Next, in  app.module.shared.ts the following imports were removed.

Then, the following import for the OpenId Connect client was added.

In the  declarations array  CallbackComponent was removed. In the  imports array  AuthModule.forRoot() was added. The route for  CallbackComponent was removed and the  canActivate condition was removed from the  fetch-data route. Finally, the  providers section is reduced to only the  AuthService. That was a lot of changes, so I am including the full finished class below.

File Deletions

The following files were completely removed. Some of them may come back in a different form, but for the moment the functions they were handling are being dealt with in a different way.

Auth Service

The  AuthService class was pretty much rewritten since it is at the core of the interaction with the OpenId Connect client. It still contains pretty much all the functionality as before just using the new client. The following is most of the class. I removed all of the HTTP calls except for  get to save space.

It doesn’t show the best in the world here so be sure and check it out on GitHub. All the IdentityServer configuration is done in the  constructor using the  OpenIDImplicitFlowConfiguration class.

Navigation Component

The  NavMenuComponent class now needs some changes to match the new  AuthService. First, the following change to the imports.

The  AuthService class now provides the ability to subscribe to changes in the user’s authorization. To handle the subscription and unsubscription the class will implement both OnInit and  OnDestroy. Here is the new class declaration.

Next, here is the implementation of ngOnInit which handles the subscription to the change in  isAuthorized.

Then,  ngOnDestroy handles the unsubscription.

The class level variable for  _loggedIn is replaced with the following two variables.

The  constructor has been greatly simplified and now only takes an instance of the  AuthService.

Finally, the  login and  logout functions have changed to match the new function names in the  AuthService class.

Navigation Component UI

In the  navmenu.component.html file, a couple of tweaks are required based on the new variable names used above. The first set is related to showing either Login or Logout.

The final change in this file was to make the link to  fetch-data only show if the user is logging instead of sending the user to an unauthorized view.

Fetch Data Component

The final changes for the conversion to the new client are in the  fetchdata.component.ts and they are only needed because of a rename of the HTTP Get helper in the  AuthService.

Wrapping Up

This change took a lot of changes, but in the long run, it is going to be a better choice since the new client is focused on Angular. Another great thing about this client is they are looking into ways to handle the first load not remembering the user is logged in due to server side rendering (issue #36).

The finished code for this post can be found here.

Migration from ASP.NET Core 1.1.x to 2.0

On August 14th .NET Core 2.0 was released including corresponding versions of ASP.NET Core 2.0 and Entity Framework Core 2.0 which got with the finalization of .NET Standard 2.0. The links take you to the release notes for each item.

In this post, I will be covering taking the project used for the ASP.NET Basics series from 1.1.x to the 2.0 release. The starting point of the code can be found here. This post is only going to cover conversion of the Contacts project.

Installation

If you are a Visual Studio user make sure you have the latest version of Visual Studio 2017, which can be found here and at a minimum should be version 15.3.

Next, install the SDK for your operating system. The list of installs can be found here. For development, it is key that you install the SDK, not just the runtime. The following is a preview of what to expect on the download page.

Csproj

The  csproj file of the project being upgraded is the best place to start the conversion. The TargetFramework needs to be changed to 2.0.

Next,  PackageTargetFallback changed to  AssetTargetFallback.

There is a new Microsoft.AspNetCore.All package that bundles up what used to be a huge list of individual packages. Those individual packages still exist, but this new one wraps them and makes it much easier to get started. The following is the package list before and after.

Last change in this file is to change the  DotNetCliToolReference versions to 2.0.0.

Program.cs

Program.cs is another area that has been simplified by creating a default builder that does all the same things that were happening before but hide the details. Keep in mind the old version still works and is valid to use if you use case needs it.

Identity

The remaining changes I had to make were all related to Identity. In the  Startup class’s  Configure function the following change was needed.

Next, in the  ManageLoginsViewModel class, the type of the  OtherLogins property changed.

The  SignInManager dropped the  GetExternalAuthenticationSchemes function in favor of  GetExternalAuthenticationSchemesAsync. This caused changes in a couple of files. First, in the  ManageController the following change was made.

The second set of changes were in the  Login.cshtml file. First the function change.

Then the change to deal with the changed property names.

Wrapping up

With the changes in the Contacts project now works on ASP.NET Core 2.0!  Make sure to check out Microsoft’s regular migration guide. as well as their identity migration guide. A full list of breaking changes for this release can be found here.

There is a lot more to explore with this new release and I have a lot of projects to update. Don’t worry I won’t be doing a blog post on all of them, but if I do hit any issues I will create a new post of update this one with the fixes. The finished code can be found here.

Identity Server: Redirect When Route Requires Logged in User

This post is going to continue where the series on IdentityServer4 left off, but I am not officially making it part of the series. There may be a few posts like this where I improve on the example applications from the series. The starting code for this post can be found here.

All the changes in the post are in the Client Application from the sample linked above. I did some cleanup on a couple of files so if you are looking for the differences keep in mind most of the changes are a result of the cleanup.

Unauthorized Component

The first step is to add a new component that will be shown to the user when they navigate to a page that requires them to be logged in but they are not. Add a  unauthorized.component.html file to the  ClientApp/app/components/unauthorized/ directory with the following contents.

This will tell the user they need to log in and provide a login button and a button to go back to the previous page. Next, add a  unauthorized.component.ts file to the same directory. This class will handle the clicks from the view.

This class is using the  AuthService for login and Angular’s  Location class to move back to the previous page.

New Component Usage

Now that this new component exists it needs to set up in  app.module.shared.ts. First, add an import.

Next, add to the  declarations array.

Finally, add unauthorized to the routes array.

Now that this new component is in place how does it get used? Well, any route that has  canActivate:[AuthGuardService] will require the user to be logged in to activate. For example, the  fetch-data route above won’t activate unless the user is logged in.

Auth Guard Service

AuthGuardService is an existing class in the project. The following is the full file.

As you can see in the  canActivate function if the user is logged in then the function returns true otherwise, the user is routed to the unauthorized component. Before the changes in this post, this dropped the user back on the home page since the unauthorized component didn’t exist.

Wrapping up

With the changes above the user gets a slightly better experience. Just being dropped on the home page wasn’t very helpful as to why that was happening. This at least lets the user know they need to log in. Another option could be to hide the navigation for the routes they don’t have access to until they log it.

The finished version of the code can be found here.

Identity Server: Calling Secured API from Angular

This post is a continuation of a series of posts that follow my initial looking into using IdentityServer4 in ASP.NET Core with an API and an Angular front end. The following are the related posts.

Identity Server: Introduction
Identity Server: Sample Exploration and Initial Project Setup
Identity Server: Interactive Login using MVC
Identity Server: From Implicit to Hybrid Flow
Identity Server: Using ASP.NET Core Identity
Identity Server: Using Entity Framework Core for Configuration Data
Identity Server: Usage from Angular

This post is going to take the solution from last week, the code can be found here, and add an example of the Client Application (Angular) calling an endpoint on the API Application that requires a user with permissions.

API Application

To provide an endpoint to call with minimal changes this example just moves the SampleDataController from the Client Application to the API Application. The following is the full class.

Make special note that this class now has the  Authorize attribute applied which is the only change that was made when moving the file from the Client Application. This attribute is what will require an authorized user for all the routes this controller services.

Client Application

In the Client Application, the first step is to remove the  SampleDataController since it is now in the API Application.

Next, in the  app.module.client.ts file, add a new provider which can be used to supply the URL of the API to the rest of the Client Application. Don’t take this as best practices for injecting configuration data it is just an easy way to handle it in this application. The following is the full class without the imports (which haven’t changed) the new item is the  API_URL.

Now for the changes that need to be made to the  FetchDataComponent which is the class that will call the new API endpoint. First, add an import for the  AuthService.

Next, there are a couple of changes to the signature of the constructor. The first is to use  'API_URL' instead of  'ORIGIN_URL'. The second is to provide for injection of the  AuthService. The following is a comparison between the version of the constructor signature.

The final change is to use  authService.AuthGet with the new URL instead of  http.get.

With the above changes, the user has to be logged in or the API will respond with not authorized for the weather forecasts end point. The Client Application doesn’t have anything to provide the user with the fact they aren’t authorized at the moment, but that is outside the scope of this entry.

So far we haven’t look at the code in the  AuthService class, but I do want to explain what the  AuthGet function is doing and the related functions for put, delete, and post. These calls are wrappers around the standard Angular HTTP library calls that add authorization headers based on the logged in user. The following is the code of the  AuthGet as well as two helper functions the class uses to add the headers.

Wrapping up

It feels like this application is finally getting to the point where other development could happen if it were more than a demo, which is exciting. My thought on how this could be used for real applications is the Identity Application would stand on its own and be used by many clients. The Client Application with a few more tweaks could be used as a template for Angular applications. The completed code can be found here.

This post finishes up the core of what I set out to learn about IdentityServer, but there could be more related posts as I continue to add some polish to the current implementation of the sample solution.